3 ms·
Genocide being the exception, perhaps. Basically, "leave it to the population to sort out themselves, even if they've lost the democratic means to do so," up u
by komali2 10mo ago
Genocide being the exception, perhaps.
Basically, "leave it to the population to sort out themselves, even if they've lost the democratic means to do so," up until a government has gone so insane it's massacring its people, or other people.
- nkmnz 10mo agoSo we should have done a much bigger intervention in Syria, much earlier? We should intervene in Sudan right now? We should finally intervene in Russia where they slaughter their own children and Ukrainians in a genocidal war of aggression? We should finally intervene in Palestine and destroy Hamas (and in Iran and destroy their Mullah-sponsors) who've committed a genocide on October 7th, killing thousands of Israelis and ten thousands of Palestinians?
- DecoySalamander 10mo agoFrom a purely moral standpoint, my answer would be "yes, absolutely." Unfortunately, most of these interventions are not practically possible. Taking out a dictator in US's backyard is so much easier (and easier to do bloodlessly) than any of these examples.
- komali2 10mo agoYes, perhaps, as well as Netanyahu to stop his genocide of the Palestinians.