3 ms·

I would choose civil war over being ruled by socialist any it's not close.

• taveras 10mo ago
  Would you elaborate on your definitions for “being ruled” and “socialist”? Does that mean you would prefer violent rebellion over a United States president with social liberal public policies? Would you have taken up arms under either of the Roosevelts? Extremism and violence tend to go hand-in-hand.
  • deleted 10mo ago
    [deleted]
  • terminalshort 10mo ago
    Did I say "social democrat" or did I say "socialist"?