I accept your criticism that I've conflated legality with Chen's personal morality. However, I think Chen has taken this action because he thinks violentacrez

I accept your criticism that I've conflated legality with Chen's personal morality. However, I think Chen has taken this action because he thinks violentacrez was objectively and unambiguous immoral -- which I think is not a univerally agreed point. I think alternative moral perspectives are indicated by the legal boundaries and the behaviors of other exploititative industries. I think this indicates that different moral standards on this issue are tolerated, even if they're still actively campaigned against. I do now feel weird for defending ephebophiles.