3 ms·
This looks incorrect. http://web.archive.org/web/20110713000446id_/http://www.google.com/ http://web.archive.org/web/20110713000446id_/http://www.goog... is onl
by qxcv 14y ago
This looks incorrect. http://web.archive.org/web/20110713000446id_/http://www.google.com/ http://web.archive.org/web/20110713000446id_/http://www.goog... is only 28K according to ls -lh.
Perhaps OP forgot to put id_ after the capture timestamp in the archive URLs? The id_ makes sure that the Wayback Machine only returns the page as it was when it was indexed.
- ISL 14y agoI definitely used id_ . I saved the source that I used; I'll recheck things.
- ISL 14y agoYou are correct, some of them slipped past, and contain archive.org code. It's quick to fix. Thank you.
- ISL 14y agoShould be fixed now. The last point is still ~100k. Running Chromium, if I'm logged in, google.com's HTML saves as 104k. Logged out, it's 94k, as measured by ls -lh.
- qxcv 14y agoLooks good. I was using cURL, so that explains the ~100k vs. ~28k discrepancy.