3 ms·
It seems great to have something that is C but cleaned up, although clay had all that with templates and move semantics. I think leaving out move semantics and
by CyberDildonics 9mo ago
It seems great to have something that is C but cleaned up, although clay had all that with templates and move semantics.
I think leaving out move semantics and destructors is inexcusable at this point. It is not only fundamental, but doesn't affect things like standard libraries, runtimes, or ABIs.
- lerno 9mo agoBut it of course move semantics and destructors affect all things. If the goal is to call and be callable from C without special constructs, how would you make the C code respect the move semantics and destructors?
- CyberDildonics 9mo agoC++ is already callable from C, you can make functions have any call signature that you want. What is the actual problem?