3 ms·
Why should a second country take the resources, instead of making Venezuela free and they keep their own?
by pests 9mo ago
Why should a second country take the resources, instead of making Venezuela free and they keep their own?
- piekvorst 9mo agoIf “making free” means building outside a system of freedom, that’s too expensive. The U.S. tried to build a “democracy” in Iraq but failed. If “making free” means just leaving people alone do what whatever they want, it’s not necessary. (They’d end up with another warlord anyways.) If the citizens of a free country want resources, why not provide them with a legitimate way to get it? The U.S. could, instead of making hypocrite puppet regimes, fully integrate (with military if needed) the resources they need into her system.
- bigyabai 9mo agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-determination https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-determination
- daveguy 9mo agoAnd Trumpty Dumpty promised he wouldn't be nation building or starting wars. I believe "no more wars, America first!" was a campaign talking point. And now a war started in our own backyard against an "enemy" who posed no threat, but had resources to grab. Trump is a fraud.