TFA: "...included only the size of the ‘.html’ file, no images or fanciness." The '.html' file for google.com has most of the 'fanciness' embedded in it in the

TFA: "...included only the size of the ‘.html’ file, no images or fanciness." The '.html' file for google.com has most of the 'fanciness' embedded in it in the form of a ton of JS and all the CSS. I think this architecture was put in place when instant search/preview went live which is the cause of the first large spike. I'm guessing the second spike is integration with google+.