3 ms·
I think that most people would define the quality of a president based on their performance for their country. If a leader pillages the country and flees with
by lostlogin 10mo ago
I think that most people would define the quality of a president based on their performance for their country.
If a leader pillages the country and flees with the money, I doubt that they would be praised for their excellence ‘because they archived what they set out to do’.
- CjHuber 10mo agoThat‘s entirely true, but my entire point is you cannot judge somebody as incompetent based on something they are not trying to achieve. You can say he‘s a bad president, makes sense because a good president serves his country. But you can’t say he is an incompetent one just because he has ulterior motives.
- lostlogin 10mo ago> you cannot judge somebody as incompetent based on something they are not trying to achieve Competency in a job isn’t defined by what the individual wants, it’s defined by the job description.
- CjHuber 10mo agoThat only works if you are trying to fulfill your job role. So would you say a quiet quitter is necessarily incompetent for example?
- lostlogin 10mo agoI’d say that a quiet quitter can be appraised against their job description. If they fulfill their role, they are competent by definition. That’s the whole point.