3 ms·
This is pure conspiracy, and doesn’t belong in this forum.
by ch4s3 10mo ago
This is pure conspiracy, and doesn’t belong in this forum.
- NickC25 10mo agoTrump agents out in full force, I see. Counter any of them with real evidence, I dare you. 1. Trump is a pedophile. This is confirmed by the fact that he's been sued for his pedaristic actions, and "wished well" his former Mossad-backed recruiter. 2. Weapons makers and oil companies have quite literally had their executives and shareholders go from the board room to cabinet or VP level positions in the US government. this isn't a conspiracy. 3. Venezuela produces very little of the drugs the US consumer consumes. Mexico, Colombia, etc.. produce far more, like double-digit multiples more. Context: I live in SoFLA and interact with Venezuelans daily, and I lived in Mexico for several years and am pretty familiar with how their cartels operate.
- deleted 10mo ago[deleted]
- ycombinary 10mo agoIt would be conspiracy if Trump didn't always say the quiet part out loud (40 seconds in) https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=153GkS75mwM https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=153GkS75mwM
- deleted 10mo ago[deleted]
- VectorLock 10mo agoConspiracy? This is all out in the open.
- ch4s3 10mo agoThe previous poster totally misunderstands how the War Power Act works, and many of those statements are at best supposition and at worst demonstrably false. The war powers act does not allow any domestic action at all. > 2. it satisfies the biggest donors to the republican party - weapons manufacturers and oil companies. This is nonsense the defense industry contributes pretty much evenly to each party. And the oil industry bit is just like the nonsense take on the Iraq war which saw virtually no contracts going to US companies. Additionally: >truth is there are effectively no drugs coming in from venezuela. While Venezuela does not supply drugs bound for the US the regime there has long partnered with FARC to smuggle cocaine and weapons[1]. > Bonus: honors the practice of a republican president invading a country under bullshit premises to capture oil. Bush I and II both did so. The first Gulf War was about kicking Saddam out of Kuwait, not capturing oil, so yeah conspiracy and false statements. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venezuela_and_state-sponsored_terrorism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venezuela_and_state-sponsored_...
- NickC25 10mo ago>This is nonsense the defense industry contributes pretty much evenly to each party. Wow, that's the most cringe thing I've seen in this thread. The defense industry owns both parties but contributes significantly more to Repbublican efforts than DEM efforts. https://www.opensecrets.org/industries/indus?Ind=D https://www.opensecrets.org/industries/indus?Ind=D You'll notice that while the defense industry contributes to DEM candidates, they far outspend on "conservative" politicians. >And the oil industry bit is just like the nonsense take on the Iraq war which saw virtually no contracts going to US companies. The US oil industry didn't get any contracts during the Iraq takeover? The oil industry literally had a Haliburton CEO, Dick Cheney, go from the C-Suite to the Vice Presidency.
- ch4s3 10mo ago> The US oil industry didn't get any contracts during the Iraq takeover? The oil industry literally had a Haliburton CEO, Dick Cheney, go from the C-Suite to the Vice Presidency. Until about a year ago most Iraqi oil contracts were held by a Chinese company that bought it's contract under Saddam an maintained it beyond the war. Haliburton mostly made money handling logistics for the war, things like construction and laundry. Oil law in Iraq was finalized post-Saddam in 2007 and pre-2000 levels of production didn't happen until 2011 after the US withdrawal. PLEASE stop bringing wild conspiracies here.
- FireBeyond 10mo ago