3 ms·

If we're talking about undressing, there is no aggregate. Some people want something; others want them not to have it. Simple. What the former want is not ille

• ben_w 10mo ago
  > If we're talking about genuine CSAM, that very different and not even limited to undressing. Why would you think I was talking about anything else? Also, "subset" != "very different" > What the former want is not illegal. So the fact they are a minority is irrelevent. Minorites have rights too. This is newsworthy because non-consensual undressing of images of a minor, even by an AI, already passes the requisite threshold in law and by broad social agreement. This is not a protected minority.
  • deleted 10mo ago
    [deleted]
  • chrisjj 10mo ago
    > Why would you think I was talking about anything else? Because this thread shows CSAM confused with other, e.g. simple child pornography. And even the source of the quote isn't helping. Clicking its https://www.iwf.org.uk/ https://www.iwf.org.uk/ "Find out why we use the term ‘child sexual abuse’ instead of ‘child pornography’." gives 403 - Forbidden: Access is denied. Fortunately a good explanation of the difference can be found here: https://www.thorn.org/blog/ai-generated-child-sexual-abuse-the-new-digital-threat-we-must-confront-now/ https://www.thorn.org/blog/ai-generated-child-sexual-abuse-t... > This is newsworthy because non-consensual undressing of images of a minor, even by an AI That's not the usage in question. The usage is "generate realistic pictures of undressed minors". Undressing images of real people is prohibited.