4 ms·

No tolerance for the intolerant.

by BoredPositron 10mo ago

lukan 10mo ago
Can you show me, where exactly Joshua Bach stands for intolerance?
- BoredPositron 10mo ago
  You've read the email exchange with epstein? How billions dieng to famine would be a good thing or culling the elderly and infirm? Don't even know why I bother answering.
  - lukan 10mo ago
    I read just parts of it. Can you link or explain what you mean here? I do not understand the connection to intolerance.
    - BoredPositron 10mo ago
      It's linked right above in this chain. I am not going to discuss why killing people is intolerant. That's just silly even for hn standards.
      - lukan 10mo ago
        You edited your post after I commented and there was nothing about killing there before. (Just something about haters) Indeed not HN standards. And if Joshua said killing people is good, I am interested in a full quote.
        anotheryou 10mo ago
        also interested in the source. read a compilation of mails and this was not in there.
        BoredPositron 10mo ago
        If you are going to defend someone you have no or very distant association with like you stated in another reply. Maybe just maybe read what everyone else is talking about, in this chain it would be his email exchange with epstein. Thanks for making ME read that pseudo intellectual shit again so YOU don't have to. "too many people, so many mass executions of the elderly and infirm make sense is the fundamental fact that everyone dies at some time .make it imporrisbole to ask so why not earilier. if the brain discards unused neurons, why shold socieity keep their equivalent." https://www.jmail.world/thread/HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026413?view=inbox https://www.jmail.world/thread/HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026413?view=i... EDIT: There was no comment before I edited mine. @dang can probably timestamp it if you want to make a fuss about.
        lukan 10mo ago
        Maybe present the full quote? "too many people, so many mass executions of the elderly and infirm make sense is the fundamental fact that everyone dies at some time .make it imporrisbole to ask so why not earilier. if the brain discards unused neurons, why shold socieity keep their equivalent The radical idea of treating individuals in a society as cells and the society itself as a well-organized organism is fascism, or course. Probably the most efficient and rationally stringent way of governance, if someone could pull it off in a sustainable way; and if it is aggressive and expansive, its efficiency makes it a virus that everybody will want to stomp out. Fascism makes romantic doo-gooders like me very uncomfortable" He dares to explore radical taboo ideas and concludes that it would be fascism, which he is not comfortable with. So .. I see nothing where he is intolerant of anything. But you seem not tolerant for people daring to explore certain thoughts in general? Even if they reach the conclusion this is not the way to go. (And maybe even an attempt at dissuading the other person of those concepts)
        BoredPositron 10mo ago
        That's why I didn't want to quote anything because it's just deteriorating into a debate club about hypotheticals. To extend your "full" quote: "The radical idea of treating individuals in a society as cells and the society itself as a well-Organized organism is fascism, or course. Probably the most efficient and rationally stringent way of governance, if someone could pull it off in a sustainable way… I rather like the treatment Fascism gets in the Amazon Series ‘The Man in the High Castle’, which explores what would have happened if the Germans and Japanese had won the war: A society that tries to function as a brutal and ruthlessly efficient machine, eliminating all social and evolutionary slack. It is very dark, but not a flat caricature of pointless evil for its own sake." Let's stay away from killing people how about the misogyny?: "You cannot learn what does not attract your attention. Women tend to find abstract systems, conflicts and mechanisms intrinsically boring."
        darubedarob 10mo ago
        Zero trust, bravo.
  - anotheryou 10mo ago
    oh, did not read that one...
darubedarob 10mo ago
Thats why hamas got chancelled?
- lukan 10mo ago
  I believe it was more about actions, not thoughts.

No tolerance for the intolerant.

lukan 10mo ago

Can you show me, where exactly Joshua Bach stands for intolerance?

BoredPositron 10mo ago
You've read the email exchange with epstein? How billions dieng to famine would be a good thing or culling the elderly and infirm? Don't even know why I bother answering.
- lukan 10mo ago
  I read just parts of it. Can you link or explain what you mean here? I do not understand the connection to intolerance.
  - BoredPositron 10mo ago
    It's linked right above in this chain. I am not going to discuss why killing people is intolerant. That's just silly even for hn standards.
    - lukan 10mo ago
      You edited your post after I commented and there was nothing about killing there before. (Just something about haters) Indeed not HN standards. And if Joshua said killing people is good, I am interested in a full quote.
      - anotheryou 10mo ago
        also interested in the source. read a compilation of mails and this was not in there.
      - BoredPositron 10mo ago
        If you are going to defend someone you have no or very distant association with like you stated in another reply. Maybe just maybe read what everyone else is talking about, in this chain it would be his email exchange with epstein. Thanks for making ME read that pseudo intellectual shit again so YOU don't have to. "too many people, so many mass executions of the elderly and infirm make sense is the fundamental fact that everyone dies at some time .make it imporrisbole to ask so why not earilier. if the brain discards unused neurons, why shold socieity keep their equivalent." https://www.jmail.world/thread/HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026413?view=inbox https://www.jmail.world/thread/HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026413?view=i... EDIT: There was no comment before I edited mine. @dang can probably timestamp it if you want to make a fuss about.
        lukan 10mo ago
        Maybe present the full quote? "too many people, so many mass executions of the elderly and infirm make sense is the fundamental fact that everyone dies at some time .make it imporrisbole to ask so why not earilier. if the brain discards unused neurons, why shold socieity keep their equivalent The radical idea of treating individuals in a society as cells and the society itself as a well-organized organism is fascism, or course. Probably the most efficient and rationally stringent way of governance, if someone could pull it off in a sustainable way; and if it is aggressive and expansive, its efficiency makes it a virus that everybody will want to stomp out. Fascism makes romantic doo-gooders like me very uncomfortable" He dares to explore radical taboo ideas and concludes that it would be fascism, which he is not comfortable with. So .. I see nothing where he is intolerant of anything. But you seem not tolerant for people daring to explore certain thoughts in general? Even if they reach the conclusion this is not the way to go. (And maybe even an attempt at dissuading the other person of those concepts)
        BoredPositron 10mo ago
        That's why I didn't want to quote anything because it's just deteriorating into a debate club about hypotheticals. To extend your "full" quote: "The radical idea of treating individuals in a society as cells and the society itself as a well-Organized organism is fascism, or course. Probably the most efficient and rationally stringent way of governance, if someone could pull it off in a sustainable way… I rather like the treatment Fascism gets in the Amazon Series ‘The Man in the High Castle’, which explores what would have happened if the Germans and Japanese had won the war: A society that tries to function as a brutal and ruthlessly efficient machine, eliminating all social and evolutionary slack. It is very dark, but not a flat caricature of pointless evil for its own sake." Let's stay away from killing people how about the misogyny?: "You cannot learn what does not attract your attention. Women tend to find abstract systems, conflicts and mechanisms intrinsically boring."
      - darubedarob 10mo ago
        Zero trust, bravo.
- anotheryou 10mo ago
  oh, did not read that one...

darubedarob 10mo ago

Thats why hamas got chancelled?

lukan 10mo ago
I believe it was more about actions, not thoughts.