3 ms·
That's sort of my thought too. Grok can't apologize, but it also can't do anything without being told. A hammer can't apologize, but it also doesn't know the di
by guywithahat 10mo ago
That's sort of my thought too. Grok can't apologize, but it also can't do anything without being told. A hammer can't apologize, but it also doesn't know the difference between hitting a nail or a person. Perhaps we could design a hammer that does less harm to a human but if it comes at the cost of being a worse hammer I don't want it
- WarOnPrivacy 10mo ago> Grok can't apologize, but it also can't do anything without being told. If you mean being told by the end user, this famously hasn't been the case. Dialing back the only restriction was enough for Grok to create nsfw material (w/o any request to create that). [Grok] didn’t hesitate to spit out fully uncensored topless videos of Taylor Swift the very first time I used it without me even specifically asking the bot to take her clothes off.
- deleted 10mo ago[deleted]
- rowanG077 10mo agoThat sounds like weasel words. "without me even specifically asking the bot to take her clothes off." What did they ask? If they asked for sexy, revealing pictures or something in that direction I think Grok delivered what was asked.
- guywithahat 10mo agoHe turned on spicy mode, which was the NSFW image generator. As far as I can tell, it's back to producing "spicy" pics but won't produce genitals/actual nudity, what the user was describing seems to have been a now-patched bug where it was generating actual nudity in spicy mode