3 ms·
So, you don't have source, this was expected.
by riku_iki 10mo ago
So, you don't have source, this was expected.
- maxglute 10mo agoI'm not here to enter your lame sealioning effort for basic facts. This is 2026, you can validate claims trivially. Or you can keep demonstrating illiteracy/innumeracy, which is just as well. Audience can go through comment chain and judge argument merits / cognitive function.
- riku_iki 10mo agoburden of proof is on you, because you made a statement. If you blindly trust LLMs, it explains well why you are like this.. > Audience can go through comment chain and judge argument merits / cognitive function. or very few care about your fantasies spam lol
- maxglute 10mo agoI've been writing metric dense post before LLMs, and even then I don't entertain sealions who don't do their own minimal research, or demonstrate inability to. LLMs simply available now for previously lazy/cognitively inept readers to validate gist if they want. For those that have trouble with basic comprehension (i.e. can't read gud so only retort is words & numbers are fantasy spam to be handwaved without much substance), LLMs can ELI5. Reciprocally, why care about the incurious who can't be bothered to do better than 5th grader.
- riku_iki 10mo agoI'll skip answering your non-sense this time..