5 ms·

I think people have little patience lately for tolerating private discussion they find objectionable with Epstein.

• lukan 10mo ago
  I think people have little patience (or rather fear) to engage with different points of view in general these days.
  • viccis 10mo ago
    I think people have found out the hard way that the paradox of tolerance is real.
  • BoredPositron 10mo ago
    No tolerance for the intolerant.
    • lukan 10mo ago
      Can you show me, where exactly Joshua Bach stands for intolerance?
      • BoredPositron 10mo ago
        You've read the email exchange with epstein? How billions dieng to famine would be a good thing or culling the elderly and infirm? Don't even know why I bother answering.
        • lukan 10mo ago
          I read just parts of it. Can you link or explain what you mean here? I do not understand the connection to intolerance.
          • BoredPositron 10mo ago
            It's linked right above in this chain. I am not going to discuss why killing people is intolerant. That's just silly even for hn standards.
            • lukan 10mo ago
              You edited your post after I commented and there was nothing about killing there before. (Just something about haters) Indeed not HN standards. And if Joshua said killing people is good, I am interested in a full quote.
              • anotheryou 10mo ago
                also interested in the source. read a compilation of mails and this was not in there.
              • BoredPositron 10mo ago
                If you are going to defend someone you have no or very distant association with like you stated in another reply. Maybe just maybe read what everyone else is talking about, in this chain it would be his email exchange with epstein. Thanks for making ME read that pseudo intellectual shit again so YOU don't have to. "too many people, so many mass executions of the elderly and infirm make sense is the fundamental fact that everyone dies at some time .make it imporrisbole to ask so why not earilier. if the brain discards unused neurons, why shold socieity keep their equivalent." https://www.jmail.world/thread/HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026413?view=inbox https://www.jmail.world/thread/HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026413?view=i... EDIT: There was no comment before I edited mine. @dang can probably timestamp it if you want to make a fuss about.
                • lukan 10mo ago
                  Maybe present the full quote? "too many people, so many mass executions of the elderly and infirm make sense is the fundamental fact that everyone dies at some time .make it imporrisbole to ask so why not earilier. if the brain discards unused neurons, why shold socieity keep their equivalent The radical idea of treating individuals in a society as cells and the society itself as a well-organized organism is fascism, or course. Probably the most efficient and rationally stringent way of governance, if someone could pull it off in a sustainable way; and if it is aggressive and expansive, its efficiency makes it a virus that everybody will want to stomp out. Fascism makes romantic doo-gooders like me very uncomfortable" He dares to explore radical taboo ideas and concludes that it would be fascism, which he is not comfortable with. So .. I see nothing where he is intolerant of anything. But you seem not tolerant for people daring to explore certain thoughts in general? Even if they reach the conclusion this is not the way to go. (And maybe even an attempt at dissuading the other person of those concepts)
        • anotheryou 10mo ago
          oh, did not read that one...
    • darubedarob 10mo ago
      Thats why hamas got chancelled?
      • lukan 10mo ago
        I believe it was more about actions, not thoughts.
  • computerthings 10mo ago
    [dead]