3 ms·
unfortunately, your comment consists of many loud hand-waving statements without much substance, so there is no much to discuss. > The point is when PRC makes
by riku_iki 10mo ago
unfortunately, your comment consists of many loud hand-waving statements without much substance, so there is no much to discuss.
> The point is when PRC makes >50% of global stuff materially but charges <50%
and could you provide source of >50%?
- maxglute 10mo agoUnfortunately, your reading comprehension can't parse basic argument, so there's not much to discuss. For >50%, pick a manufactured finished good or intermediary good like steel, electronics, solar modules, batteries, shipbuilding, xyz components, and chances are PRC produces more than 50% of it by volume/units/tonnage, but not gross/value add. For more broad proxy indicator, look at share of global export TEUs, PRC ships out like ~50% of filled containers, OCED 20%, Row 30%. Emphasis on filled, i.e. take away empty container traffic that flows back to PRC to be filled. Hence western cope is PRC export only ~30% by gross/value (both $$$ figures) that underestimate how many sectors PRC makes more than >50% stuff in while capturing <50% in $$$. And this only considering PRC only exports 20% of GDP, i.e. a lot of manufacturing stays at home.
- riku_iki 10mo agoSo, you don't have source, this was expected.
- maxglute 10mo agoI'm not here to enter your lame sealioning effort for basic facts. This is 2026, you can validate claims trivially. Or you can keep demonstrating illiteracy/innumeracy, which is just as well. Audience can go through comment chain and judge argument merits / cognitive function.
- riku_iki 10mo agoburden of proof is on you, because you made a statement. If you blindly trust LLMs, it explains well why you are like this.. > Audience can go through comment chain and judge argument merits / cognitive function. or very few care about your fantasies spam lol
- maxglute 10mo agoI've been writing metric dense post before LLMs, and even then I don't entertain sealions who don't do their own minimal research, or demonstrate inability to. LLMs simply available now for previously lazy/cognitively inept readers to validate gist if they want. For those that have trouble with basic comprehension (i.e. can't read gud so only retort is words & numbers are fantasy spam to be handwaved without much substance), LLMs can ELI5. Reciprocally, why care about the incurious who can't be bothered to do better than 5th grader.
- riku_iki 10mo agoI'll skip answering your non-sense this time..