5 ms·
Well that discussion talk is not an open discourse about the situation... He quoted what he believed was scientific evidence in a private conversation that bec
by anotheryou 9mo ago
Well that discussion talk is not an open discourse about the situation...
He quoted what he believed was scientific evidence in a private conversation that became public, has comments on fashism being efficient are clearly anti-facist and believed to observe a gender stereotype. No matter if the facts were true, it should be possible to discuss such things (especially those you think are facts) in private without getting canceled. Even if they would play in to the hand of racism or sexism if made as public statements.
I found his appology a bit weak, but I also don't see his offense, despite the messages in public being offensive and possibly harmful.
- viccis 9mo agoI think people have little patience lately for tolerating private discussion they find objectionable with Epstein.
- lukan 9mo agoI think people have little patience (or rather fear) to engage with different points of view in general these days.
- viccis 9mo agoI think people have found out the hard way that the paradox of tolerance is real.
- BoredPositron 9mo agoNo tolerance for the intolerant.
- lukan 9mo agoCan you show me, where exactly Joshua Bach stands for intolerance?
- BoredPositron 9mo agoYou've read the email exchange with epstein? How billions dieng to famine would be a good thing or culling the elderly and infirm? Don't even know why I bother answering.
- lukan 9mo agoI read just parts of it. Can you link or explain what you mean here? I do not understand the connection to intolerance.
- BoredPositron 9mo agoIt's linked right above in this chain. I am not going to discuss why killing people is intolerant. That's just silly even for hn standards.
- lukan 9mo agoYou edited your post after I commented and there was nothing about killing there before. (Just something about haters) Indeed not HN standards. And if Joshua said killing people is good, I am interested in a full quote.
- anotheryou 9mo agoalso interested in the source. read a compilation of mails and this was not in there.
- BoredPositron 9mo agoIf you are going to defend someone you have no or very distant association with like you stated in another reply. Maybe just maybe read what everyone else is talking about, in this chain it would be his email exchange with epstein. Thanks for making ME read that pseudo intellectual shit again so YOU don't have to. "too many people, so many mass executions of the elderly and infirm make sense is the fundamental fact that everyone dies at some time .make it imporrisbole to ask so why not earilier. if the brain discards unused neurons, why shold socieity keep their equivalent." https://www.jmail.world/thread/HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026413?view=inbox https://www.jmail.world/thread/HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026413?view=i... EDIT: There was no comment before I edited mine. @dang can probably timestamp it if you want to make a fuss about.
- darubedarob 9mo agoThats why hamas got chancelled?
- lukan 9mo agoI believe it was more about actions, not thoughts.
- computerthings 9mo ago[dead]