4 ms·
For perspective, they found it doesn't violate the SCA, but it may still violate the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. Anyway, their reading of the law lends itsel
by sageikosa 14y ago
For perspective, they found it doesn't violate the SCA, but it may still violate the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.
Anyway, their reading of the law lends itself to a requirement to maintain (at least) two copies of a message (one the primary, and others the backups). If there is only one "copy" then it cannot be a backup.
- randomchars 14y agoSo if I sync my emails to my phone than I have two copies and according to their logic the online one is a backup, right?
- sageikosa 14y agoHow do I know? I'm a techie. :-) From a utilitarian perspective, most emails I don't need to keep around once I'm done reading them, so any copy is a backup (just in case I need it again, but not because I know I'll need it again). If I know I'll need it again, then the online copy is the instrument of record. From a multiple copy standpoint, if I don't clear my browser cache, the online form is a backup, (one could "argue").
- knighthacker 14y agoAgreed. More than likely, it is in violation to the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.