4 ms·

Brad Schoenfeld felt the same way, so he did the study on trained participants, and made the same finding: https://journals.lww.com/nsca-jscr/fulltext/2015/1000

Brad Schoenfeld felt the same way, so he did the study on trained participants, and made the same finding: https://journals.lww.com/nsca-jscr/fulltext/2015/10000/Effects_of_Low__vs__High_Load_Resistance_Training.36.aspx https://journals.lww.com/nsca-jscr/fulltext/2015/10000/Effec...

malfist 9mo ago
That is a very underpowered study, only 18 participants
- evanjrowley 9mo ago
  Is there another study with more than 18 participants and results that conflict with this study here?
  - deleted 9mo ago
    [deleted]
  - sandspar 9mo ago
    You don't need to disprove an underpowered study. You can just default to ignoring it. Especially in a field as notorious for replication issues as fitness and nutrition.
AstroBen 9mo ago
Oh that's interesting > it is possible that the type I fibers of subjects were underdeveloped in comparison with the type II fibers as a result of training methodologies. The type I fibers therefore may have had a greater potential for growth compared with the type II fibers Maybe a mix of both types of training would be best then?