3 ms·
That makes total sense. In a shell environment, breaking the flow for 10+ seconds would definitely be more painful than the memory overhead. The 'instant' feel
by charlesding2024 9mo ago
That makes total sense. In a shell environment, breaking the flow for 10+ seconds would definitely be more painful than the memory overhead. The 'instant' feel is crucial for UX here. Thanks for the detailed explanation!
- taklaxbr 9mo agoThanks, glad it resonates. For interactive tools like shells, I think perceived latency matters more than raw resource efficiency. Once the flow breaks, UX is already lost — a few extra MBs are a small price for that instant feel.