3 ms·
>Why don't we age gate hands? Making this sort of reductio ad absurdum doesn't make you seem witty or clever. It just makes you seem pedantic and unable to re
by stackghost 9mo ago
>Why don't we age gate hands?
Making this sort of reductio ad absurdum doesn't make you seem witty or clever. It just makes you seem pedantic and unable to reason about things like a functioning adult.
- deleted 9mo ago[deleted]
- antonvs 9mo agoThat might be the case if they weren't correct. I notice you didn't actually say anything about what's wrong with the point.
- stackghost 9mo agoDo I really need to waste my time explaining why age-gating hands is not feasible, realistic, or even worth considering? Really?
- antonvs 9mo agoYou should look up the word "analogy". Do I really need to waste my time explaining why age-gating the internet is not feasible, realistic, or even worth considering? Really?
- Cytobit 9mo agoAd hominem attacks can't be much better.
- jswelker 9mo agoI thought it was witty and clever.
- ndsipa_pomu 9mo agoI don't think you're adding anything to this discussion with that kind of comment. The idea of age-gating hands is to demonstrate that overly broad age gating IS ridiculous and the lack of sufficient targetting by Texas is precisely why the judge is throwing it out. Please try to engage with commenters with a little bit more respect and hopefully better understanding.