3 ms·
But: it's obvious why he wrote the article. It is to bolster his own claims, not to give Lilienfeld his due.
by jacquesm 11mo ago
But: it's obvious why he wrote the article. It is to bolster his own claims, not to give Lilienfeld his due.
- boulos 11mo agoHow would you distinguish the article from an honest write up about transistors? That is, you know about his crusade in ML, but if you didn't, how would you decide that this article is written in bad faith or not? I agree that context matters, and I had the same thought as you. But does that mean that anything he writes on the topic of "who was first" is inherently tainted?
- jacquesm 11mo agoBecause I read the article and checked the citations. It's a dead giveaway.