I’ll also note that the publisher was right to bring up AI, even if they did not do it in an artful way. He himself comes to doubt the need for his book in the

I’ll also note that the publisher was right to bring up AI, even if they did not do it in an artful way. He himself comes to doubt the need for his book in the era of LLMs and he says that is part of why he cancelled. To his publisher’s credit they raised the issue early in the process where a pivot would have been more practical. In fairness to the author, he presents a reasonably balanced view and it did not read to me like “my publisher sucked.”