3 ms·
As a counterpoint, I seems to me that the ML field is too heavy on theory. A lot of the theoretical papers are proposed with weak or no experimental tests. The
by kurtosis 18y ago
As a counterpoint, I seems to me that the ML field is too heavy on theory. A lot of the theoretical papers are proposed with weak or no experimental tests. There are very few people doing thorough experimental work. What I have in mind is something like Chen and Goodman's comparison of different language models - this is a great paper and I'd love to see more like it.
The obvious example of this is boosting where the theory lagged far behind the experiment - everyone wanted to invent a theory to explain why boosting was so effective.
hey industrialists out there - publish!
- physcab 18y agoWe're trying! I'm using machine learning to detect explosives. It's a difficult problem, but it works quite well.