7 ms·
I don’t believe for a second that it was a mistake. Probably got a call from some C-level and came up with this excuse.
by rpgbr 9mo ago
I don’t believe for a second that it was a mistake. Probably got a call from some C-level and came up with this excuse.
- usefulcat 9mo agoDo you have any idea just how much code is in Windows? I did a quick search and estimates are in the 50-60 million lines range. No way in hell are they going to rewrite all that in a few years. Even if they actually wanted to, which they don't because it would be a truly enormous expense (even for Microsoft). Not to even mention that huge software projects have a well deserved reputation for failing, and the scope of such a rewrite would probably dwarf any previous rewrite of anything, ever, and by a very large margin. "Rewrite all of Windows in Rust" simply does not even begin to pass the sniff test.
- 0cf8612b2e1e 9mo agoGood news, because part of the original post was that engineers should soon be able to handle a million lines of code a month. So 60 engineers to birth an OS in a month. … Our strategy is to combine AI *and* Algorithms to rewrite Microsoft’s largest codebases. Our North Star is “1 engineer, 1 month, 1 million lines of code,” Galen Hunt, who is a top-level Distinguished Engineer at Microsoft, wrote in a now-edited LinkedIn post.… Maybe he did not say Windows, but it is not a leap to imagine it falls under the umbrella of “largest codebases”