2 ms·

It does not pass the "friend test" in that if a human friend were to make such comments instead of ChatGPT making them, the human friend would be within his fre

It does not pass the "friend test" in that if a human friend were to make such comments instead of ChatGPT making them, the human friend would be within his free speech rights to have made them. As such, I don't see any valid legal issue here affecting ChatGPT that should stand in court. I see possible ethical and objectivity issues, but not a valid legal issue.

o_nate 10mo ago
It depends on the specifics of what was said. As the complaint states, OpenAI has yet to release the full transcripts.
deleted 10mo ago
[deleted]
calcifer 10mo ago
> It does not pass the "friend test" [...] not a valid legal issue. What legal doctrine is that, and can you point towards precedent? Or is it one of those "I feel like the law should" situations?
- OutOfHere 10mo ago
  Yes, it is called free speech, as is already duly noted in my parent comment which you may read again. In fact, the responsibility to note a legal doctrine of wrongdoing is entirely yours.
  - layer8 10mo ago
    That’s not what free speech means.
    - OutOfHere 10mo ago
      Free speech absolutely does allow assigning blame, whether correctly or incorrectly. It also allows suggesting criminal action at some point in the future, just not imminently.
deleted 10mo ago
[deleted]
deleted 10mo ago
[deleted]