4 ms·
Thanks for demystifying prototypes. For me it's hard to think that you can have an object without defining its class. However it seems the right approach. We're
by snatcher 14y ago
Thanks for demystifying prototypes.
For me it's hard to think that you can have an object without defining its class. However it seems the right approach. We're speaking about Object orientation, not Class orientation so why bother with classes
- speg 14y agoYou can think of a literal object as having a default class of 'Object', the built in native object.