5 ms·
It's like ya'll are so eager to crap on a thing that you don't even read tfa. > this server is physically held by a long time contributor with a proven track r
by troyvit 10mo ago
It's like ya'll are so eager to crap on a thing that you don't even read tfa.
> this server is physically held by a long time contributor with a proven track record of securely hosting services.
So you are assuming it's a rando's basement when they never said anything like that.
If their way of doing business is so offensive either don't use them, disrupt them or pitch in and help.
> I understand this is a volunteer effort, but it's not a good look.
What does make a "good look" for a volunteer project?
- wtallis 10mo ago> What does make a "good look" for a volunteer project? It's an open-source project. It should be... open. Not mysterious or secretive about overdue replacements of critical infrastructure.
- ptx 10mo agoWhat would that look like in this case?
- well_ackshually 10mo ago> this server is physically held by a long time contributor with a proven track record of securely hosting services. This is effectively a rando's basement. It doesn't matter that they've been a contributor or whatever. Individuals change, relationships sour. Securely hosting how ? By locking the front door ? By being a random tech company in the midwest ? Or by having proper access control ? As a little reminder, F-Droid has _all_ the signing keys on its build server. Compromising that is somewhere between "oh that's awful" and "stop the world". These builds go out as automatic updates too. So uh, yeah, I'd like it if it was hosted by someone serious and not my buddy joe who's a sysadmin don't worry
- jabwd 10mo ago> This is effectively a rando's basement. You. Do. Not. Know. Stop straw-manning stuff its so pointless.
- herewulf 10mo agoThe not knowing is the point. From a security perspective, you have to assume the worst. And maybe that is F-Droid's point: Security through obscurity. If the build infrastructure with the signing keys is unknown, then it's that much harder for Bad Actor to do things like backdoor E2E encrypted communication apps. This is, of course, the weakness in E2E encryption in apps obtained from mainstream/commercial app stores. For all we know, these may already be backdoored depending on where it came from. However, the obscurity makes F-Droid hard to trust as an outsider to the project.