4 ms·
> disproportionally So even you concede they benefit almost everyone, only they benefit some more. So should we really be dismantling them and descend into ana
by like_any_other 10mo ago
> disproportionally
So even you concede they benefit almost everyone, only they benefit some more. So should we really be dismantling them and descend into anarchy, just to harm a group you dislike? Doesn't seem like a good move.
- aeternum 10mo agoAll I'm saying is that if a society wants true equality, it cannot have property laws because some individuals will inevitably own more than others. We must decide which is more important.
- gottorf 10mo agoI think the historical evidence is pretty clear that the only way we can achieve true equality in wealth is in equal squalor.