3 ms·
It's worth noting with a few clicks from the linked article, you can find that this company is (at least according to LinkedIn) a single person. Which explains
by mjr00 10mo ago
It's worth noting with a few clicks from the linked article, you can find that this company is (at least according to LinkedIn) a single person. Which explains how the whole company can fit into a repo. But also makes you question how valuable the "insights" here are, like obviously a single-person project should be using a monorepo...
- wrs 10mo agoAh, so "our" company is referring to "me and Claude"? Actually. Claude might be a pretty good co-founder. Half the job is therapy conversations anyway. :)
- mehmetkose 10mo agohave you ever heart that google is also one repo? at least it was until 2015. don’t know the story later. So it doesn’t have to be one person company. yet they are making billions
- teaearlgraycold 10mo agoGoogle isn’t a monorepo since the acquisition of Android. That one never made it into google3.
- mjr00 10mo agoI'm not making any claims about monorepo being good or bad and I'm fully aware large companies have monorepos (or at least very large repos). I'm saying that the fact it's a one-person "company" needs to be taken into account when talking about how applicable their experience is to other companies.