3 ms·
> Affirmative action sets up a zero-sum game where fixed resources like university admissions and employment offers are redistributed to people with the "correc
by BeetleB 10mo ago
> Affirmative action sets up a zero-sum game where fixed resources like university admissions and employment offers are redistributed to people with the "correct" demographics.
I wish I could find the source, but the vast majority of universities don't have a fixed admissions quota. They are criteria based (if you meet the criteria, you get in). In principle, AA admissions did not prevent others from getting a seat.
Of course, it's possible the general admissions criteria is raised slightly to compensate, but again - for most universities, AA admissions wasn't a significant number, and however much the bar raised, it was likely minuscule.
I'll be blunt. Everyone I've personally known who didn't get admissions in a particular university and blamed AA for it was trying to get into a top school, and likely didn't earn his spot.
- verteu 10mo agoCA Prop 209 is a good natural experiment: https://reappropriate.co/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Total-UC-admissions1.jpg https://reappropriate.co/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Total-UC...
- BeetleB 10mo agoThis tells me only about a few universities, and there are too many confounding variables.
- skibidithink 10mo agoIt's better data than the people in one person's life.
- ls612 10mo agoBut you can look at trends in other comparable states compared to California both before and after CA outlawed AA at public California universities by referendum.
- deleted 10mo ago[deleted]