3 ms·

> Many members of the UN are openly biased against Israel, many are officially against the very existence of Israel and have always been, and they happily vote

> Many members of the UN are openly biased against Israel, many are officially against the very existence of Israel and have always been, and they happily vote on any condemnation of Israel regardless of what Israel does. "regardless of what Israel does" they haven't tried ending the occupation yet; do you really think they would be condemned for doing so? > and countries that do not allow Jews to enter. Which countries are these exactly?

soldthat 10mo ago
This predates the occupation.
flyinglizard 10mo ago
In 2005 Israel end the occupation in Gaza by evacuating all Jews from the strip and leaving it in Palestinian Authority control. Next came Hamas, then the rockets, then the incursions and finally October 7th.
- mrexcess 10mo ago
  >In 2005 Israel end the occupation in Gaza This is misinformation. Although Israel did pull its settlers from most of Gaza in 2005, it retained air, sea, and land border control. That is still a military occupation. The reality is, Israel never ended the occupation in Gaza.
  - flyinglizard 10mo ago
    No, the misinformation is yours. Israel pulled out Jews from all of Gaza, going back to the pre-1967 line. Gaza shared a land border with Egypt (Rafah crossing) which Israel did not - and could not - control. While Israel retained air and sea passage control, the blockade as we know it only came after Hamas was elected as the Gaza government and not before. (this is the opportunity to note that after the Israeli pullout from Gaza, Gazans could have chosen many different paths but they chose Hamas to lead them into the catastrophe they've become)
    - pcthrowaway 10mo ago
      Gaza has been considered occupied by the UN, the ICJ, the ICC, the EU, and pretty much any body which studies international law, since 1967. Israel is the only entity who claims they have not been occupying Gaza during this period. > this is the opportunity to note that after the Israeli pullout from Gaza, Gazans could have chosen many different paths but they chose Hamas to lead them into the catastrophe they've become Even in 2005, after Israel's removal of their settlers and before Hamas came to power in 2007, Israel was still occupying Gaza, according to an ICJ ruling, based on Israel continuing to exert control over Gaza.
      - FunnyUsername 10mo ago
        > Israel was still occupying Gaza, according to an ICJ ruling That's not what the court said. Its language was > In light of the above, the Court is of the view that Israel’s withdrawal from the Gaza Strip has not entirely released it of its obligations under the law of occupation. Israel’s obligations have remained commensurate with the degree of its effective control over the Gaza Strip. As it often does, the court used intentionally ambiguous language to try to get a majority of judges on board. But the most natural reading seems to be a novel idea that occupation is non-binary, and Gaza lies somewhere on a spectrum of being occupied or not. https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/186/186-20240719-adv-01-00-en.pdf https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/186...
        pcthrowaway 10mo ago
        So your argument is that from 2005-2007, there was a window where Gaza was maybe not technically occupied?
        FunnyUsername 10mo ago
        From 2005-2023, the whole period where there were essentially zero Jews or Israelis in Gaza. Of course parts became occupied in response to Oct 7.

soldthat 10mo ago

This predates the occupation.

flyinglizard 10mo ago

In 2005 Israel end the occupation in Gaza by evacuating all Jews from the strip and leaving it in Palestinian Authority control. Next came Hamas, then the rockets, then the incursions and finally October 7th.

mrexcess 10mo ago
>In 2005 Israel end the occupation in Gaza This is misinformation. Although Israel did pull its settlers from most of Gaza in 2005, it retained air, sea, and land border control. That is still a military occupation. The reality is, Israel never ended the occupation in Gaza.
- flyinglizard 10mo ago
  No, the misinformation is yours. Israel pulled out Jews from all of Gaza, going back to the pre-1967 line. Gaza shared a land border with Egypt (Rafah crossing) which Israel did not - and could not - control. While Israel retained air and sea passage control, the blockade as we know it only came after Hamas was elected as the Gaza government and not before. (this is the opportunity to note that after the Israeli pullout from Gaza, Gazans could have chosen many different paths but they chose Hamas to lead them into the catastrophe they've become)
  - pcthrowaway 10mo ago
    Gaza has been considered occupied by the UN, the ICJ, the ICC, the EU, and pretty much any body which studies international law, since 1967. Israel is the only entity who claims they have not been occupying Gaza during this period. > this is the opportunity to note that after the Israeli pullout from Gaza, Gazans could have chosen many different paths but they chose Hamas to lead them into the catastrophe they've become Even in 2005, after Israel's removal of their settlers and before Hamas came to power in 2007, Israel was still occupying Gaza, according to an ICJ ruling, based on Israel continuing to exert control over Gaza.
    - FunnyUsername 10mo ago
      > Israel was still occupying Gaza, according to an ICJ ruling That's not what the court said. Its language was > In light of the above, the Court is of the view that Israel’s withdrawal from the Gaza Strip has not entirely released it of its obligations under the law of occupation. Israel’s obligations have remained commensurate with the degree of its effective control over the Gaza Strip. As it often does, the court used intentionally ambiguous language to try to get a majority of judges on board. But the most natural reading seems to be a novel idea that occupation is non-binary, and Gaza lies somewhere on a spectrum of being occupied or not. https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/186/186-20240719-adv-01-00-en.pdf https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/186...
      - pcthrowaway 10mo ago
        So your argument is that from 2005-2007, there was a window where Gaza was maybe not technically occupied?
        FunnyUsername 10mo ago
        From 2005-2023, the whole period where there were essentially zero Jews or Israelis in Gaza. Of course parts became occupied in response to Oct 7.