In every country in every region everyone will only look after themselves and their families, and their community. To the degree which they do this, is the degr

In every country in every region everyone will only look after themselves and their families, and their community. To the degree which they do this, is the degree to which a punishment is to be expected and enforced, and the degree to which the benefits outweigh the drawbacks. The topic of Indian history is beyond my depth, but conjectures and conjectures on the inferiority of other people in regards to their own, coming from an Ivory tower, are the common vice of the westerner, historically. Take away power tripping officers that would turn you into swiss cheese for smiling, add more precarity, colonialism, bring in a couple of nation wide disasters, the great depression was a play field, in comparison, and suddenly people would bold up, people would have to adapt to survive, sometimes at the expense of being civic, and the culture would change, it has to. Yes, those poor Indians living in precarity are the same as any westerner. No, not everyone in India is trying to rob their way to freedom. My conjecture, unlike yours, that I'm unable to state as matter of fact out of respect to mine and other's intelligence, is that colonialism and famine is more likely to be the culprit behind a take-to-get-ahead culture, of course the first is never the culprit.