3 ms·

Don’t most camera manufacturers (like ARRI and BlackMagic) have test footage for their raw and/or log formats on their websites? Here’s ARRI’s (which includes P

• randall 10mo ago
  yeah but distributing them is probably not just “oh it’s open source!”
  • otterley 10mo ago
    These are motion pictures, not software. “Open source” is about the latter.
    • rib3ye 10mo ago
      I believe open source is about the law. Software is one way it can be applied.
      • otterley 10mo ago
        IAAL (but this is not legal advice). Anyone can freely license a work to the public, and copyright holders were doing that long before modern computers were invented. “Open source” (other than, say, in the context of open water sources or intelligence or journalistic sources, where it was rarely used) as a descriptive term did not enter the common lexicon until 1998 and that was specifically to refer to software source code. https://opensource.com/article/18/2/coining-term-open-source-software https://opensource.com/article/18/2/coining-term-open-source...
        • scott_w 10mo ago
          You’re correct but words and phrases can evolve in their meaning over time. If the licensing terms for this are analogous to open source software licensing terms then calling it “open source media” is pretty reasonable.
          • otterley 10mo ago
            I’m all for linguistic evolution as long as it decreases ambiguity and confusion, as opposed to exacerbating it. See: “literally.”
            • kennyadam 10mo ago
              It's awful what happened to literally. The enormity of the change in meaning is so egregious. When it literally gets used with both meanings in the same conversation, decimating my brain, I have to wonder how nonplussed anyone trying to learn English must be. I'm sure there are plenty of words it's happened to, but this must the most egregious example.
              • efreak 10mo ago
                Is it decimating your brain literally or figuratively? You only have one, after all.
        • p91paul 10mo ago
          IANAL, but I think open source started with software since software has source and binary form. Now with compression and other shenanigans, probably even videos or images could be argued to have a source and binary form. I don't know a thing about multimedia, but people here saying this "open source" release is a good thing mention specifically the fact that it's the uncompressed version, or as the FSF would call it, "the preferred form of the work for making modifications to it".
    • clbn 10mo ago
      But... you'll see Netflix calls it "OPEN SOURCE CONTENT" if you click the link.
      • otterley 10mo ago
        You are right! At least the link title got it right.
    • RobotToaster 10mo ago
      It's not popular, but even creative commons, the organisation that wrote the licence they are using, prefers the term "free cultural work" https://creativecommons.org/public-domain/freeworks/ https://creativecommons.org/public-domain/freeworks/
    • saghm 10mo ago
      They're "we won't sue you for using these" bytes. The terminology might be fuzzy but I feel like everyone in this thread understands the concept.