No, and to do so would be to challenge the law itself since the laws are written with reference to postmark date. Perhaps ironically, video evidence has been u

No, and to do so would be to challenge the law itself since the laws are written with reference to postmark date. Perhaps ironically, video evidence has been used to invalidate ballots. In 2023, a CT judge invalidated the results of the Democratic primary, finding "ballot stuffing" in that 1,253 absentee ballots were submitted at Bridgeport dropboxes despite surveillance video only showing 420 people using the boxes. A new Democratic primary was ordered. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023%E2%80%9324_Bridgeport,_Connecticut_mayoral_election https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023%E2%80%9324_Bridgeport,_Co...