3 ms·
It contradicts the post it was replying to, which was saying, effectively, that people don't want to spend any money on stuff. I don't think it's required to b
by danaris 10mo ago
It contradicts the post it was replying to, which was saying, effectively, that people don't want to spend any money on stuff.
I don't think it's required to be making some universal point when you clearly respond to the argument put forward in the post you reply to, do you?
- eviks 10mo agoNo, you misunderstood the comment, it said that paying nothing is compelling, not that paying something was inconceivable or something; it was a response to a comment with a common misconception that pirating is only some "service problem"
- fc417fc802 10mo agoI agree with your earlier comment (GGP) and feel like you're contradicting yourself here. "Too expensive" is either a service problem or at least directly adjacent to it. It's distinct from "well if I can get away with piracy then I'll do it". To say that free is a compelling price is to imply the latter as opposed to the former (at least imo).