4 ms·
But it is not legally required, and at least my smaller German ISP doesn’t seem to care.
by leonwip 10mo ago
But it is not legally required, and at least my smaller German ISP doesn’t seem to care.
- lucb1e 10mo agoWhich one is that? I would be interested in paying a bit more if the ISP is better. In the Netherlands we always had xs4all, nowadays sorta morphed into freedom internet, which was started from a hacker magazine and kept the spirit, fighting surveillance and censorship while offering regular ISP services and then some. I'm not aware that Germany has such a thing so any step in the right direction would make me switch if I can get it (should be fine if it's available via Telekom's public network, we're currently on a virtual operator as well)
- jillesvangurp 10mo agoI use an o2 DSL connection in Berlin. The domains I tested seem to resolve fine. And you can of course configure an alternate DNS. Which apparently I didn't yet on my new laptop. So, that is fixed now. Mostly that's just a performance fix. Operator DNS tends to be a bit slow to respond and it's nice to get back a few milliseconds. But I also don't mind my operator not spying on me. Of course I also use Firefox so mostly that just bypasses the system DNS entirely and uses dns over https.
- borlox 10mo agoMy ISP doesn't care either. Why would they.
- __jonas 10mo agoOf course, the CUII is not a government entity, it's just a group of copyright holders and ISPs, the member list is here: https://cuii.info/mitglieder/ https://cuii.info/mitglieder/
- Timwi 10mo agoWhat incentivizes an ISP to become a member if it's not legally required and it pisses off (some) customers?
- tensegrist 10mo agonot becoming a member might piss off the copyright holders and incentivize them to send you unwelcome legal communications
- fignews 10mo agoMy small”ish” German ISP advertises Google DNS in its DHCP response