3 ms·
In terms of compile times, boost geometry is somehow worse. You're encouraged to import boost/geometry.hpp, which includes every module, which stalls compile ti
by a_t48 10mo ago
In terms of compile times, boost geometry is somehow worse. You're encouraged to import boost/geometry.hpp, which includes every module, which stalls compile times by several seconds just to parse all the templates. It's not terrible if you include just the headers you need, but that's not the "default" that most people use.
- forrestthewoods 10mo agoboost is on my “do not ever use ever oh my god what are you doing stop it” list. It’s so bad.
- a_t48 10mo agoSame.