5 ms·
Maybe next time just look one one more click into the ownership. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBT_Media https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBT_Media IBT Media was
by daveguy 10mo ago
Maybe next time just look one one more click into the ownership.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBT_Media https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBT_Media
IBT Media was owned by the parent company of Newsweek for 5 years 2013-2018.
It is now owned by followers of this guy:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Jang https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Jang
So... Yeah.
- sanskritical 10mo ago[flagged]
- daveguy 10mo agoNo bigotry at all. It has nothing to do with his ethnicity. Just that the guy and his followers are notably biased, and they are open about it. Sorry you misunderstood as bigotry my pointing out the clear bias of the owners and your incorrect attribution of ownership. Look at the content section of your original link about IBT. The rag is clearly not run on sound journalistic practices.
- sanskritical 10mo agoOkay, so it is about him being Christian and not Asian.
- daveguy 10mo agoNope. It's about him being vocally biased and claiming his purpose in media is specific to an agenda. That agenda is specifically not journalism. So yeah... Really doesn't have anything to do with the motives you are falsely attributing to me. Might want to read your own sources before you start flinging accusations. You can try to twist my words however you want, but it seems your usual targets are much more easily manipulated. Sorry buddy.
- sanskritical 10mo ago> and claiming his purpose in media is specific to an agenda. This is literally every single media outlet's owners, so he's at least more honest than the rest of them.
- daveguy 10mo agoThat is false. There are still decent outlets dedicated to journalism. Yeah, besos and buddies are fkn once reputable journalistic sources. But there are still independent outlets focused on journalistic integrity.
- deleted 10mo ago[deleted]