3 ms·
Can you give me some evidence that this document was backdated? I'm not saying the government isn't shady AF, but I just wonder what's behind the immediate jump
by noworld 9mo ago
Can you give me some evidence that this document was backdated? I'm not saying the government isn't shady AF, but I just wonder what's behind the immediate jump to "this has to be BS" rather than keeping an open mind.
- the_af 9mo agoExtraordinary claims (that RV is a real phenomenon) require extraordinary evidence. The null hypothesis is the default position, it requires no extraordinary evidence; the opposite does. This is scientific method 101. Let's not pretend we're not familiar with it just because some dodgy CIA document surfaced.
- noworld 9mo agoAh, since the claim contradicts materialism, you get to make up a scenario, present no evidence, then put the burden on the other side. Got it. There's literally extraordinary evidence in the PDF, you just don't like it.
- the_af 9mo agoI didn't make up any scenario. RV is the made up scenario. If you want to reject the scientific method go ahead, but you won't find much sympathy here.
- olyjohn 9mo agoYou call that extraordinary evidence? Looks pretty vague to me. "Ship. Round thing. Structure. Water. Propeller." Give me a break. Reads like the typical psychic scammers.