4 ms·
[flagged]
by Yizahi 10mo ago
[flagged]
- tim333 10mo agoThe UN is generally ok?
- Yizahi 10mo agoImo their track record regarding Israel is very biased and spotty across multiple decades, not only last two years.
- soldthat 10mo agoThe UN is not an unbiased institution. It’s a representation of the viewpoints of countries, and it’s quite obvious that many member countries are biased to one side on the matter. Countries get an equal vote regardless if they are corrupt dictatorships with abysmal human rights at home.
- beej71 10mo agoWe can draw no logical conclusions from your ad hominem comment. Do you have some data?
- Yizahi 10mo agoMy data is based on the internationally recognized fact that Hamas is terrorist organization by USA, Commonwealth, EU, Japan and others. Which means they (Hamas) are liars. Journalist's data is based on the empty words of the said terrorist org. I don't know about you, but I feel very confident in my opinion based of this data. PS: also you don't know what ad hominem means and confuse it with regular criticism. I've never attacked journalist's personal life or inividual traits or even his unrelated articles.
- y0eswddl 10mo agowhat about the other 200+ countries that don't designate Hamas or Gazans as territosts for resistance invasion and colonisation?
- Yizahi 10mo agoWhatever tickles your fancy. You can take side of almost 40 civilized countries, topping the charts of human freedom, education, quality of life, intellectual pursuits, research etc. or the side of Axis of Losers, like Ruzzia, Iran, Best Korea, Venezuela etc. Your choice. Around a hundred of the countries didn't designate Hamas as terrorists, but neither they support them, they are simply neutral and ignoring the issue. And btw, your count is wrong. There are only 205 countries at all, plus or minus a handful maybe. Almost 40 of them designated Hamas as terrorists, so that leaves less than 200, not more.
- beej71 10mo agoYou say you have data, but I haven't seen it. How many Palestinians have been killed? You said the numbers were wrong because of the people who said it. Your argument was directed "at the man"--"ad hominem".
- tomhow 10mo agoPlease don't comment like this on HN. The guidelines make it clear we're trying for something better here. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html