3 ms·
It appears we are talking about two different things. I am discussing this article as news reporting, which it is, and it meets the journalistic standard for s
by 1659447091 10mo ago
It appears we are talking about two different things.
I am discussing this article as news reporting, which it is, and it meets the journalistic standard for such. You are wanting an investigative report or exposé on a follow-up news event that happened this week. They are simply not the same and I would question anyones ability to publish a reliable investigative feature in that time.
- like_any_other 10mo ago> I would question anyones ability to publish a reliable investigative feature in that time. The BBC are not naive babes born yesterday. All of the context I gave is more than a year old. They would not create a new investigative feature, but simply reference old ones, by themselves or media they trust. The equivalent of writing "North Korea borders South Korea, and they share a history of hostilities." in an article about Kim's latest missile test.