The article barely mentions boomers, and in the one place it does, it cites a stat, and then immediately abdicates them of any responsibility for that stat. Th

The article barely mentions boomers, and in the one place it does, it cites a stat, and then immediately abdicates them of any responsibility for that stat. The rest of the article is about a different generation of folks and the current conditions/perceptions of those conditions. Why make this about boomers? The article is not about them, nor is a brief factual mention of them unfair. Nor is the follow up sentence absolving them of responsibility for the one thing time are mentioned.