3 ms·
The date (2003) is incorrect. The article itself refers to events from 2009, is listed at the bottom of the page as having been last updated in 2014, with a cop
by senko 10mo ago
The date (2003) is incorrect. The article itself refers to events from 2009, is listed at the bottom of the page as having been last updated in 2014, with a copyright notice spanning 2018, and a minor correction in 2019.
- throwaway29303 10mo agoThe date (2003) is incorrect. You're right, it's even older than that; it should be (1999). https://web.archive.org/web/*/https://www.kegel.com/c10k.html https://web.archive.org/web/*/https://www.kegel.com/c10k.htm...
- petters 10mo agoSeems to be some kind of living document. It was refered to as an "oldie" in 2007: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45603 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45603