4 ms·
>I don't mind how Liquid Glass looks at all. I do, and the fact that it isn't even optional is crazy. Windows Vista vibes where they first looked at what the
by apexalpha 10mo ago
>I don't mind how Liquid Glass looks at all.
I do, and the fact that it isn't even optional is crazy.
Windows Vista vibes where they first looked at what the could technically pull off on todays' hardware. And mind you: Liquid Glass is very impressive!.
It's just not necessary.
- downrightmike 10mo agoWho decided things that slide in place need to jiggle like jello?!
- seemaze 10mo agoI've been describing it as if the ui has been covered in corn syrup; like it has been drizzled in a slow and sticky and slightly blurry layer of transparent obfuscation.
- cmurf 10mo agoAlthough outright opt-out isn't possible, it seems like heading to Accessibility -> Motion -> Reduce Motion (on) and Prefer Cross-Fade Transitions (On) reduces the effect. I'm not sure if this reduces the buggy artifacts though.
- therealpygon 10mo agoNecessary has never been the deciding factor for Apple’s decisions, especially when it comes to design. Nor has “optional” ever really been part of that discussion. They know, like most people, supporting multiple interface simply creates more BS to maintain for the few resistant people who don’t accept change. Like it or hate, you bought an Apple. I don’t particularly like it either — reality is what it is and if I don’t like it that much, there are other phones I can buy when I upgrade.
- steve-atx-7600 10mo agoI can't remember windows vista actually making content illegible or reduced the content area in a focused window like Apple has done.