3 ms·
There is a flip side to this. Yes it was stabilizing to have “boring” news where every provider largely had the same stories. But there was a narrower Overton w
by softwaredoug 10mo ago
There is a flip side to this. Yes it was stabilizing to have “boring” news where every provider largely had the same stories. But there was a narrower Overton window of issues to be discussed. A single thread of attention at any one time.
There are advantages to the disjointed, small, grassroots, often histrionic, news of today. We get a lot more perspectives in our news. We get so many it’s overwhelming (and we sadly need to jump into our corners to feel safe).
Anyone can start a Substack now and the market can decide if they’re a journalist. In my town there are several more trusted and prominent than the local broadcast news. Some specialize in a topic like housing. Some focus on govt going’s on. And of course there are local nutjobs (or I think they are, others disagree?
It’s messy and not nearly summarized, but in some ways it’s better and more detailed than bland evening news.
- Tagbert 10mo agoCurrent news media is even more narrowly focused on the three hot news stories of the day with 24-hour repetitive commentary all funneled into the narrative of the day.
- softwaredoug 10mo agoYes though cable news is in a gradual decline https://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/here-are-the-cable-news-ratings-for-october-2025 https://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/here-are-the-cable-news-rati... The real action in news media is in flagship newspapers (WSJ, NY Times), podcasts, substacks..