3 ms·
lol https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alex_Karp https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alex_Karp https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palantir_Technologies https://en.wikipedia.o
by mexicocitinluez 10mo ago
lol
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alex_Karp https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alex_Karp
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palantir_Technologies https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palantir_Technologies
You could have at least read Palatir's wiki before commenting.
Here are some hightlights:
> Karp and Zamiska argue that American technological dominance requires deeper integration of Silicon Valley and defense interests.
> Karp contends that China operates with fewer ethical constraints than American defense companies, making technological leadership essential for national security
> According to the Journal, for two years the company continuously revised its technology based on the demands of analysts from the intelligence agencies, introduced to them by In-Q-Tel.[1
Do you need more? That's a single paragraph.
- s1artibartfast 10mo agoWhat is objectionable in those quotes? Do you disagree?
- mexicocitinluez 10mo agoDid you even read what I was replying to? > They’re basically just a consulting company that turns your random excel sheets and old databases into something you can search. What does responding with what Palantir really does have anything to do with my objections to them?
- s1artibartfast 10mo agoSure I did, I just don't know what the quotes are intended to demonstrate
- mexicocitinluez 10mo agoYou first asked me what I found objectionable. Then I pointed out that it's irrelevant to what I said. Now, instead of admitting you're wrong you're pretending like you cant understand why quotes showing that Palantir isn't just a dashboard company would be a good response to someone who thinks Palantir is just a dashboard company. At least argue in good faith.