4 ms·
Good observation. In Houston the rail does not actually extend to any suburbs, if they have that in Chicago it would probably make a big difference. I got the
by fuzzfactor 9mo ago
Good observation.
In Houston the rail does not actually extend to any suburbs, if they have that in Chicago it would probably make a big difference.
I got the idea when they were building it in Houston that a large bit of the Metro system is geared toward transporting people in lower-income areas who can't afford cars, so they can gain employment downtown and in the med center.
When it comes to toll roads most suburbs have a long-established freeway commute, but directly west from downtown a major suburb is known as the International District containing a large concentration of immigrants. The only traffic solution leading in that direction was built as a tollway instead.
It all started with the Beltway 8 toll bridge with toll that was cheaper than the gas saved by taking alternate routes.
By now the toll road authority has expanded and embraced a growth mindset for so long, and in recent years gotten so expensive, that any upcoming candidate for County Judge may be able to prevail on a single-issue of lowering the tolls alone.
- dangus 9mo ago> I got the idea when they were building it in Houston that a large bit of the Metro system is geared toward transporting people in lower-income areas who can't afford cars, so they can gain employment downtown and in the med center. This is how most US cities view public transit: poor people only. Only a handful of US cities treat it as something that everyone uses, places like NYC, Chicago, DC, and Boston. Houston should have an equivalent to the Metra or MBTA commuter rail.
- SoftTalker 9mo agoIt works in NYC and Chicago because owning a car there is frightfully expensive even if you're middle-class. Parking costs, city fees, higher gas taxes, higher insurance, and massive rush hour congestion all make owning a car unattractive.
- deleted 9mo ago[deleted]