3 ms·
Kagi systematically doesn’t return any good answer whatsoever. It’s such an awful quality that I can’t imagine anyone seriously promoting it, therefore I bet th
by eastbound 10mo ago
Kagi systematically doesn’t return any good answer whatsoever. It’s such an awful quality that I can’t imagine anyone seriously promoting it, therefore I bet these comments about Kagi are advertising posted by bots. It’s not possible otherwise.
- xigoi 10mo agoDefinitely not a bot (you can check my comment history) and I can recommend Kagi.
- yablak 10mo agoHappy user of kagi for several years. This is the opposite of my experience. Your comment strikes me as dishonest.
- exitnode 10mo agoI am also very happy with Kagi's search result and suspect that someone is just trolling.
- alwa 10mo agoI find it to be more reliably useful than the other non-Google alternatives I’ve tried. I find its “PDFs Only” filter to be awfully handy too. Proudly not a bot, but I freely admit that, because I pay for it and our incentives seem aligned, I’m biased toward giving it the benefit of the doubt. Always open to new horizons, though—are there non-Google search products that you find to consistently work better?
- matthewmacleod 10mo agoHolding an opinion like “everyone apart from me is a shill or an idiot” is not an attractive quality in a human.
- azuanrb 10mo agoI share the same sentiment. I know many people praise Kagi, and I respect the effort behind it too. I tried it for three months and realized it was not for me. Google works just fine for my needs.
- loehnsberg 10mo agoHaha… no bot here. Been using Kagi for years now. Not sure what you‘re searching for. My own tests, admittedly early, found no instances, where Google gave better results.