> It may have been nice to expose some reasonable defaults for code coverage measurements too. Would love built in coverage support but investigation is needed

> It may have been nice to expose some reasonable defaults for code coverage measurements too. Would love built in coverage support but investigation is needed on the design (https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues/13040 https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues/13040) and we likely need to redo how we handle doctests (https://blog.rust-lang.org/inside-rust/2025/10/01/this-development-cycle-in-cargo-1.90/#all-hands-doctests https://blog.rust-lang.org/inside-rust/2025/10/01/this-devel...).