3 ms·
Sure, my initially argument was that it was good for China, but bad for the rest of the world because of China's anti-market practices that only benefited China
by tooltalk 9mo ago
Sure, my initially argument was that it was good for China, but bad for the rest of the world because of China's anti-market practices that only benefited China. In other word, 2/3 of the world came out losing because of China's mercantile practices -- it's had negative net effect for the world.
Again, no point in talking in circles.